Contract Lengths for Major League Baseball Players (n = 516) |
In fact, more than half of the contracts (almost 53%) were for just one year. As might be expected, these one-year contracts were at the lowest salary levels. They were also awarded to older players (age 31.2) showing that one-year contracts are used primarily to sign journeymen that fill out the roster and provide depth in case of injury.
Contract Length | Players | Share | Average Salary | Average Age |
1 Year | 272 | 52.7% | $3.51 Million | 31.2 |
2 Years | 126 | 24.4% | $4.86 Million | 31.4 |
3 Years | 34 | 6.6% | $7.80 Million | 29.7 |
4 Years | 22 | 4.3% | $9.45 Million | 28.9 |
5 Years | 20 | 3.9% | $10.16 Million | 28.5 |
6 Years | 26 | 5.0% | $13.01 Million | 28.7 |
7+ Years | 16 | 3.2% | $19.18 Million | 30.1 |
Of the 272 players with 1-year contracts, almost half (42%) had been awarded those contracts during arbitration. The average age of players with contracts awarded in arbitration was 28.6. If we remove those contracts from the pool of 1-year contracts, the average age rises above 33.
1-Year Contracts | Players | Share | Average Salary | Average Age |
Arbitration | 113 | 21.9% | $4.41 Million | 28.6 |
Non-Arbitration | 159 | 30.8% | $2.24 Million | 33.1 |
Finally, if we look at the "Overall" rating assigned by Baseball Mogul, we see that the longer contracts at higher salary levels are awarded to the more talented players.
(Here is the data with the arbitration contracts split out from the pool of 1-year players)
Contract Length | Players | Overall Rating | Average Age | Average Age at Signing |
(Arbitration) | 113 | 78.9 | 28.6 | 28.6 |
1 Year | 159 | 79.9 | 33.1 | 33.1 |
2 Years | 126 | 81.4 | 31.4 | 30.8 |
3 Years | 34 | 84.7 | 29.7 | 28.6 |
4 Years | 22 | 85.6 | 28.9 | 27.4 |
5 Years | 20 | 85.0 | 28.5 | 26.5 |
6 Years | 26 | 88.2 | 28.7 | 26.1 |
7+ Years | 16 | 90.7 | 30.1 | 26.6 |
It seems that the youngest group of players are those with 5-year contracts, with the average age rising again for 6-year and 7-year contracts. However, if we instead calculate the average age at which the contract was signed, we see a steady downward trend towards signing younger players to longer deals. This would seem to go against the conventional wisdom which holds that players don't sign deals of this magnitude (7+ years) until their late 20s (or early 30s), when they have had enough time to prove their worth on the free agent market.
6 comments:
Shouldn't the average age of signing for the arbitration row (first row) of the last table be 28.6, not 33.1?
Great stuff, Clay! I've always signed younger players to long-term deals in Mogul, and am reluctant to commit to a player who will be in their late thirties when a contract expires. Jay Bruce is a real-life example of this strategy; Pujol's first contract is another.
Awesome stuff, Clay. David Ortiz should try reading the blog, and realize that his salary is 10M above the average for someone with a one year arbitration contract, and 11M above the average for any 1 year contract. Maybe then he'd stop complaining about not having that 2 year deal.
Zug - a belated thanks for noticing that typo. Fixed.
Based on this analysis, does that mean that we will finally see that journeyman or aging veteran contract demands decreasing in both length and value? In addition, will there be the ability to offer guys just minor league contracts just like most journeyman or veterans get when they're on the free agent market very late in the offseason, spring training, or during the season?
Awesome game that keeps getting better! I would like to see the use of the 40 man roster and rule 5 draft. Also, would like to see an energy bar for players so I know when to sit a player. Best game ever!
Post a Comment